Social Media Wiki

Dose of Digital Heading to SXSW…Maybe

Every year, digital marketing geeks (like me) descend upon Austin, Texas for a conference called South by Southwest, a.k.a. SXSW. What started as a music and then film festival, the conference’s biggest draw is now the “Interactive” category. That’s where you’ll find all the latest digital innovations that everyone is talking about. Typically, there hasn’t been a whole lot at SXSW focused on healthcare. But SXSW 2011 will feature a one-day health track for the first time.

Why am I telling you this? Each year SXSW selects the sessions and speakers for the conference from submissions by combining input from the SXSW staff, an advisory board, and us…the public. Anyone can submit a proposal for consideration. This year there were 2,800 submissions across the three categories of film, music, and interactive. I submitted a presentation about a topic that I have a lot of passion for and have written about a number of times on this blog. It’s also the topic that I’m going to cover in the book I plan to actually start writing someday soon (info on the topic below).

My request to each of you is for your support. It’s simple. Head over to my proposal on the SXSW “Panel Picker” site and give it a thumbs up and leave a comment. From what sources have told me, the comments are even more important than the votes, so since you’re already there, please leave a comment too. It might take you one minute if you’re not registered (to prevent voting fraud). If you’re already registered, it’ll take 10 seconds.

I know, I know. Registering. Voting. Commenting. What a pain.

I’d rather not beg, but I will try to lay some guilt on you.

If you’ve gotten something useful from this blog in the past (like, say, the Pharma and Healthcare Social Media Wiki, which probably includes a link to your blog/site/Twitter), then maybe you can do is take a look at my proposal and vote for it if you like it.

A cheap tactic, I know, but that’s the best I could come up with. So, that link once more: http://panelpicker.sxsw.com/ideas/view/5499

I’d recommend voting now, as it’s only open for a limited time.

By now you’re probably wondering what you’re voting for. Here’s my submission:

Your Computer Is the Next Wonder Drug

-

A few times each year, the press buzzes about the latest scientific advance that will someday cure any one of the diseases we fear the most. Nearly every one of these will turn out to be nothing more than a news story and far from a pill that can help improve our health. We spend hundreds of millions of dollars every day on research, as we struggle to find the “magic bullet” that will rid the world of conditions such as cancer, heart disease, and diabetes. We almost never find the magic. While the big, historic scientific advances may be what dominate the headlines, in the end, it’s the small improvements and better utilization of the technology we have already have that will ultimately lengthen our lives and improve its quality.

These technologies don’t come from labs filled with test tubes or cell cultures, but rather from labs filled with computers and the programs that run them. In the future, it will be digital technologies that prevent, treat, and finally cure diseases and not the latest “blockbuster” drug that has yet to be discovered (and might never be). Digital technologies can already help us understand which treatments are best for us, what diseases pose the greatest risk, and how diseases spread among us. They can improve our interactions with doctors and improve access to care for everyone. Instead of waiting for the next miracle drug to be developed, you might find the miracle was there all along right inside the computer you use every day.

Questions answered from this presentation:

  1. How math (and not science) will transform the future of disease diagnosis and treatment?
  2. Which technologies will fundamentally change the way people gather information about their health, whenever and however they want it?
  3. How will advances in technology for healthcare lead to a greater willingness in people to give up their healthcare privacy?
  4. What changes in technology will completely change the way we manage and track our health and how we share that information with others?
  5. When will technology improve access to and and the quality of healthcare for everyone who needs it?

____

If that sounds good to you, whether you’re attending SXSW or not,  I’d love to have your support for my proposal.

And if you’re feeling really generous, feel free to send out a tweet, update your LinkedIn status, or click the Like button on this post to spread the word to your social networks.

Thanks in advance for your support.

UPDATE (8/12): Thanks to Rohit Bhargava for including my submission in his “25 SXSW 2011 Panel Ideas Worth Getting Excited About

-

Pharma Company of the Year in Social Media — Dosie Awards

After a couple weeks of voting across 9 different categories spanning four total rounds, I thought I’d covered just about everything with the Dosie Awards (2010 Dose of Digital Dosie Awards Finalists here). However, after all the voting was done, I received a ton of emails, DMs, and IMs asking me one question that I don’t have the answer to: which company is the best? Which company is leading all others in social media in pharma and healthcare? I have some opinions on this, but I also realized that I’m not the only one with an opinion and the opinions are pretty varied. So, there’s only one way to settle this…the Dosie Awards.

So, I’m creating a final category: Company of the Year.

To be eligible, I’m requiring that a company have at least five entries on the Pharma and Healthcare Social Media Wiki. I think it would be tough to argue that any company could be the best with fewer than this based on the competition. So, here we go again…one more category in the Dosie Awards. This time it’s a battle of the heavyweights. Who do you think is the best?

Presented by:

-

-

The Ballot

-

Pick the single company you think is doing the best in social media. This isn’t just their corporate-level work, you should consider all of the social media programs being done by the company. Include your comments if you’d like. You can leave comments anonymously or get credit for them if you’d like. Comments are helpful to add a little more insight as who wins and why. Voting closes on Wednesday, May 5, 2010 at 5pm EDT. [NOTE: if you are viewing this post in an email or on a smartphone, you may need to click the link click through to the full post or the link to the survey in order for the ballot to work.]

The Rules

-

A few housekeeping notes:

  • Voting is open to everyone. You don’t need a Twitter account or anything like that. You just need to know how to select a checkbox. This isn’t a contest among marketing people or just “patients,” everyone is invite and encouraged to vote.
  • You can only vote once in the Best Company Category. So, even if you voted in the other categories, you can still vote in this one.
  • Share, share, share. To make the voting results as robust as possible, we need a lot of voters. Tweet, update your status, write a blog post, even use good old-fashioned email to spread the word to others.
  • Lobby for your favorites, but do so responsibly. It’s all right to encourage people to vote for your favorites, but don’t try to stack the vote or bring in a bunch of “dummy” voters who don’t really care about this stuff. We’ve got some fancy tech stuff happening over here to prevent this (plus you’ll look really bad when you get exposed). Don’t become a case study.

The Winners

-

Oh yes…winners. When are they announced? The winners will be announced live during the upcoming BDI conference “Social Communications & Healthcare: Case Studies & Roundtables” along with all the winners of the different categories. The conference is on May 11 from 8:30 AM until 1:00 PM at The Graduate Center of The City University of New York in midtown Manhattan, New York City. BDI is not directly involved in these awards, but have been kind enough to give me a live audience and venue to announce the winners. If you want to be there in person, you can register here: http://bit.ly/aMAlR4. Use promo code “Dosies” and you can get in for just $155.

The winners will be announced at the conference and then released online immediately after my presentation.

Winners, don’t expect a big trophy for this…the recognition and admiration of your colleagues will have to do this time (plus a really cool badge you can embed on your site).

Looking forward to seeing everyone in New York and to announcing the winners soon.

[ref: EAVB_RHSHZFBUMF]

Why Cataloging and Calculations Should Be King

Dose of Digital Mini White Paper

norway map

Do you know all of your national capitals?

Quick.

The capital of Norway.

Got it? Stumped?

Stay tuned for the correct answer.

For those of you who learned and remembered this type of information from your grade school days, congratulations. Geography is a tough subject for most of us. There was a time (not too long ago) when it would have been pretty challenging to find the answer to this question if you didn’t learn it at some point in the past and remember it. For those who didn’t know the answer and “Googled” it, accidentally stumbled upon the point of today’s post.

Recall a time not too long ago when you didn’t have Internet access. If you wanted to find out a capital of a country, you didn’t have much choice but to look it up in a book. If you had some encyclopedia’s on hand, you could find it there. You might even find it in one of those giant unabridged dictionaries or an almanac. If you didn’t have any of those, you were out of luck. You could call a friend to get the answer, but you certainly couldn’t send them a tweet or even an email.

Things have changed very dramatically in the past 15 years or so, such that it isn’t necessary for you to have a set of encyclopedias in your house should someone challenge you on the capital of Norway (which is, of course, Oslo). To find the answer today, you just search for it online. We even have a new word to describe it: “I Googled it.” For you youngsters out there, there wasn’t always a company called Google, much less a verb based on it. Today, of course, you can find out the answer to any factual question almost instantly no matter where you are. With mobile technology advancing very quickly, you can do much of what a desktop PC can do with only an iPhone. If you compared the guidance computers used for the Apollo moon missions to an iPhone, the two wouldn’t even appear to have been developed by the same species, much less separated by less than 40 years. One stat: the Apollo computer’s speed was 1.024 MHz. My iPhone’s is 600 MHz (my laptop is 2.53 GHz, which is about 2000 times faster than Apollo’s). Enough geek talk, what’s the point?

The point is that there’s no reason to waste your time learning capitals of countries. With this type of  information at your fingertips in an instant, wouldn’t your time be better spent elsewhere versus the hours required to memorize information you might never need? Yes, there’s value in learning, but not memorizing information like this. The value come from learning how to remember things and how to process information.

Let me put it more plainly. Basic information has no value. It has no monetary value and very little time value. Since you can get it anywhere for free, almost instantly, it’s a waste of resources to learn it and have it cataloged in your own head.

Instead, what you do with this information is far more useful. That’s what people pay money for. That’s why we hire consultants. For example, we don’t pay them to tell us the capitals of countries, but rather which ones are likely to have the biggest influence in global economics in the next 10 years.

The question for content producers (and if you’re reading this and have a website, you’re one of them) is what this means for your content creation strategy and what value you provide to people. If you’re giving them information they can get elsewhere, then you aren’t adding value. I’ve already shown you “How Google and Bing Plan to Eliminate the Need for WebMD” by providing basic disease state and medication information, such that you never have to even leave the search engine to get it, much less dig through your website.

This change is happening now and will only exacerbate in the future. Less and less content will be stored in people’s heads and we’ll focus more on interpretation. Less and less value will be placed on basic information, as it will be everywhere, easy to access, and completely free. As a marketer, do you know how you can prepare for this future and to lead the change as it’s happening now?

That’s what I’m here for.

Before we go any further, you have to accept the fact that “content is king” isn’t really true anymore. While Bill Gates coined the term (good trivia question BTW), it’s been adopted by entertainment companies most recently. Ironically, you don’t need to look much further than these companies to see that this phrase no longer holds true. They have been the first to have their business models turned upside-down simply because the content itself isn’t as valuable as it used to be.

There are two different areas that you need to look for a future “king.” Cataloging and Calculation. Try these on for size: “Cataloging is king” or “Calculation is king.”

Cataloging is King

For as much as I might talk about how wonderful it is that content is available everywhere, in massive amounts, and for free, there’s a problem. Content is available everywhere, in massive amounts, and for free. That’s right…it’s good and bad. You already know the benefits, but here’s the downside. With all the content out there, it becomes very difficult for people to find exactly what they need. It’s simple to find the capital of Norway, but what about finding how many people lived in Norway in 1980 compared to 2000. That information exists, but not all in one, nice, neat place and not in this format. At best, you’d have to look up the populations in both years and break out your calculator to do the rest. Or do you? The evolution is already in up and running: WolframAlpha. While it’s still a little hard to use if you’re not familiar with it, it’s a powerful computational tool that does more than just math and was able to instantly give me the answer to my question. The power lies not in the data, as it comes from free, open-source databases, but rather in how you access the data. Here, WolframAlpha saved you two steps, as you don’t have to look up the population information for each country or do the math on your own.

Companies that make it easy for people to sift through the data that’s available will lead in the future. For healthcare companies, this means being able to take information about a certain disease and personalize it. Picture this: I want to find only information that’s relevant to my condition and treatment stage and history. Let’s say a patient has stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). I’ve already taken carboplatin and Gemzar (together) and then Taxotere after progression. His question is simple: “what treatments are now indicated and what’s the average time to progression for these treatments?” If you think about it, that’s really a simple question, but it would be almost impossible to find out the answer online quickly and easily despite all the information needed to answer the question being freely available.

If this person visited the average website, he’d have to sort through all the different stage information to find stage IV, then look through each of the treatments and data to see what’s applicable to him. The WolframAlpha-style solution would allow him to type (or use drop-down selections) in his stage and past treatments, what parameters he needs to know and then spit out an answer. The companies who present the data, the content, in this format will lead in the future. How hard would it be to create this tool? Answer: not very.

The second part of aggregation is alerting people when information has changed. To take our example above of the NSCLC patient, if a new treatment is approved or studied that matches his current status, he needs to know about it immediately. He shouldn’t have to go online and dig around everyday for new news. It needs to come to him. That’s the idea behind RSS, but this needs to go even further to make feeds automatically from any source, not just pages that happen to have feeds already. This exists in many areas, but for customized data like we need here, it’s not that simple. Making new, relevant information available to people that finds them instead of the other way around is the future.

When you wrap all of this together, whoever is able to simply and effectively catalog and deliver all the content that’s out there will win the day.

Calculation is King

I take this theory very much to heart and have tried to practice it here on this blog. Rarely will you ever see me simply stating a bunch of facts or statistics (that you can get anywhere else) without an interpretation of that information. The statistics and facts have no value. I hope the interpretation does. That’s the reason why some posts (like this one) run a little long. I try to present the data, what it means, and what it means for you. That’s calculating.

The main point here is that you’re trying to help people make choices. This is what Bing’s entire “Decision Engine” positioning is based on. They don’t want to just give lists of information (i.e., links) leaving you to pick which is the right one, they want to guide you to the answer. Here’s how they’re promoting this concept via a series of clever commercials:

If you want to see the actual features that Bing is touting to deliver this new type of searching, then you can check out the video here (big points off for Microsoft since I can’t embed the video here). While I’m not totally sure that Bing delivers on this big promise (helping you make decisions) just yet, it’s a step in the right direction. What Bing understands is that the content (in this case, links) isn’t as important as helping you find the information. When you search for something on Google (or Bing), you aren’t doing it to see what links come up, you’re doing it to find the answer to your question. Think about that for a minute.Today, both of these search engines are trying to do this for basic searches. That’s why, for example,  if you type “define” followed by any word in Google, you get the definition as the first listing, so you don’t have to go to another page on another site to find the answer. You don’t want links, you want answers.

It’s the same thing for any other type of question. Going back to our NSCLC patient, he doesn’t want  bunch of links. He wants to know the answer to this question: “what treatments are now indicated and what’s the average time to progression for these treatments?” The answer(s) should be easy to find and immediately available (that is, he shouldn’t have to dig through tons of pages to find the answer). That’s a good first step and is why “Cataloging is king.” To deliver “Calculation is king,” you need to be able to not only answer this question, but to then tell our patient which treatment of the possible choices is best and why.

Of course, this already exists. We call them doctors. But a doctor isn’t always available to answer these questions. When you’re researching, you’re probably doing it to educate yourself so that when the doctor does recommend something, you understand why. I’m not recommending that we cut doctors out of the equation or that they won’t be important in the future. Rather, I’m saying that the “calculations” they do based on their knowledge and experience is what is valuable and what people need. But it’s not the sole domain of doctors or any other expert either. The companies that can effectively find the information and analyze it for people are the ones who will win in the future. They will win because they will be the go-to source for answers. If people come to you for answers and you can supply them, then you’ve provided something of almost limitless value and will have created a very powerful bond with your consumers.

Contrast this to the information and content you supply today for people visiting your sites or through brochures or any other medium. How far are you away from being able to provide calculations and not just content? I know that there are limitations to what pharma companies can recommend, but that’s narrow thinking. It’s not the way the world works now and certainly not the way it will work in the future. Far from being a starry-eyed optimist, I’m even more of realist. If you can’t figure out a future where you can provide this service to patients in some form, then you will be left behind. The good news is that you have some time to figure it out. The bad news is that it isn’t that much time.

Remember: content isn’t king anymore. Cataloging and Calculations are king.

9 Simple Steps to Getting Started in Social Media

Dose of Digital Mini White Paper

It’s clear that more and more companies are getting the green light from their leadership teams to get started in social media. That’s right…you’ve fought long and hard and patiently explained the rationale. You’ve shown examples (including a bunch from the Pharma and Healthcare Social Media Wiki) and statistics and even set out some clear objectives. Whatever you did…it worked. You’ve got the green light. Question is: what now?

When it’s finally time to get started, here are the simple steps you need to follow.

9 Simple Steps to Getting Started in Social Media

-

  1. Define business objectives
  2. Monitor with intent
  3. Choose the proper platforms
  4. Secure and create profiles
  5. Learn the lingo
  6. Dive in
  7. Go offline
  8. Track your progress
  9. Automate

-

1. Define business objectives

No, you can’t skip this one. It’s probably the least “sexy” of the nine steps, but it’s also probably the most important and will help define what you do in the next 8 steps. Ultimately, it will be the difference between a successful social media effort and a failure. There are a couple of questions you need to ask yourself as part of this step.

First: Why social media? Why now?

If you don’t have good reasons for this beyond “we just want to try some stuff,” then forget it. You’ll probably be better off spending your time and money elsewhere.

Second: What do you want to accomplish?

This is a bit of a trick question. DO NOT define a “social media strategy.” You should not have a social media strategy. Instead, you should brand objectives. This might  be something like “increase market share to 25% by December 2010,” for example. In order to achieve these objectives, you’ve put together a set of strategies that will get you to those objectives. To deliver those strategies, you’ve come up with a number of tactics. Social media is one of those tactics. Nothing more, nothing less. If you create a social media strategy, it’s highly likely that your social media efforts won’t line up with your overall business objectives. This will make it even harder to measure the impact of these efforts or will outright fail. Perhaps you need social media, perhaps you don’t. Look at it as part of a larger marketing plan to figure this out.

2. Monitor with intent

I’ve talked quite a bit about social media monitoring on this blog including Pharma Should Forget About Social Media Monitoring and Monitor This, Forget That — “The Monitoring Continuum.” Catch up on those two posts to get my entire take on monitoring. For those looking for the short version, monitoring is important, but you need to ensure that you have a purpose for that monitoring. One important quote:

“The point [is] not that everyone should truly forget about monitoring, but that they should forget about it if they don’t plan on doing anything with what they find. In other words, if you’re not going to respond to discussions or don’t have a FORMAL plan to use what you find in some research setting (presumably to inform some brand strategy), then you’re wasting your money. Monitoring for the sake of monitoring or to “see what people are saying about your brand” (my favorite consultant quote) is useless. It’s a bit like getting punched in the face to see if it hurts. I’ll save you the time…it does.”

Of course, since you’re ready to get started in social media, you have a reason to monitor. First, you need to get a gist for the volume and tone of discussions about your brand, but more importantly, you want to figure out where most and the most significant discussions are taking place. That’s a formal goal. A simple one, but still a formal goal.You don’t need to spend a fortune on this. Instead, for this purpose, you can rely on free tools such as Google Alerts, Social Mention, or Who’s Talkin.

That leads us to the next step.

3. Choose the proper platforms

This is where you’re going to pick the platforms where you’ll participate. There are a number of factors you’ll need to consider here. First, the discussion volume you measured in step 2 should be a big factor. Second, you need to consider where your target audience is online. It’s likely that these two will overlap, but not necessarily. What digital tools (including social media) are your key targets using online? Some of you know that I have a “mini-book” in the works that will help with this step (tentatively called “Digital Savviness”). If you want to know more about this or be informed when it’s completed, head over to the Digital Savviness page.

Another consideration here is how you might be received if you do participate in discussion. Are outside brands welcome? Is there a formal way for them to participate? Check this all out before you dive right in and start chatting it up. The final consideration is your risk tolerance. Each different social media platform has a slightly different risk profile. I’m referring to regulatory risks here. Specifically, the more open the platform, the more risk. For example, it might look like this, with riskier platforms on the left. The less you can control the discussion, the greater the risk.

Determine what your company’s risk tolerance looks like and factor that into your platform decision.

4. Secure and create profiles

Another seemingly simple, but somehow regularly overlooked step in the process is this one. Once you’ve settled on the platforms, then your first step needs to be to lock down your brand names. What you’re trying to prevent is squatters from stealing your brand names and, at best, locking you out or, at worst, posing as you while doing significant damage to your brand. Go out to the sites you’ve targeted and see if your brand names are available. If so, great. Secure the profiles now. Not next week or tomorrow…now. You’ll thank me later. If your brand name is taken by someone else, you’ll need to dig a bit further to see if you can secure it from them. Each platform has different rules here with some being more willing to help you get back your trademarks and others just the opposite. If you don’t do this early, you end up with this:

Suffice it to say, this isn’t the actual Pfizer (though the image of “big pharma” enjoying Family Guy makes me smile). For the record, the actual Pfizer account on Twitter is @pfizer_news.

Rather than going to each site one by one, you can use a service like KnowEm, which will secure your name on hundreds of social media sites (for a fee). This is great for locking in profiles even on those sites that you might not have any intent of using at this point, but you never know what you might want to do in the future. Better safe than sorry.

After you lock in the right user name, spend some time on this next part: creating profiles. I can’t express the importance of this enough. What I’m referring to is completing those profile boxes like “About you” and “Websites” and adding a picture of yourself (or your brand). You know the ones I mean. You probably haven’t done this on most sites. There are a number of reasons why you should. First, on Twitter for example, many people will not follow someone who does not have a competed profile. This means picture, description, and website (like mine). Second, most of these profiles on social media platforms are indexed by search engines. If you’re like most companies, you can use all the help you can get in the way of search engine optimization. Take it where you can get it.

5. Learn the lingo

Nothing will end your social media foray quicker than not playing by the rules. That is, you need to participate in way that follows the accepted norms of that site. (There are a bunch of other rules that healthcare folks need to follow. You can get them from this presentation: Annotated Version of Healthcare and Social Media…Know the Rules (1891 downloads).) A big piece of this is learning the terms of service (TOS) for the site you’re interested in. These TOS documents will include things like what’s considered spam and other obvious violations, but it will also cover more subtle, but equally important guidelines.

Case in point. If you are planning to edit your company’s article on Wikipedia, do you know how to properly do it? Sure, you can simply go and edit it, but I can assure you that your changes will be undone almost instantly. If it’s your company, according to the accepted norms of Wikipedia, you have a conflict of interest and should follow the guidelines they clearly define. This explains that you shouldn’t edit the page directly, but rather should use the discussion (talk) pages and include this tag on your entry:

If you dont’ follow these rules, you’ll quickly find the community “mob” making you into an outcast. Beyond rules, you need to understand the way people talk and the jargon they use. If you don’t know what an “RT” or the “#” symbol means in Twitter, study up before you get involved. If you don’t know, look it up. Even better, observe some of the community’s leaders. You’ll also find that these leaders (in general) are open to helping new people use the site correctly, so ask questions. They’ll appreciate that you value their opinion and that you want to play by the rules.

6. Dive in

We’ve come to the fun part. After months (or years) of wrangling with your regulatory team and studying the different communities, you’re finally ready to actually go online and participate. One major recommendation for this step is to participate personally first. That is, try out everything you’ve learned as a regular person and not a brand. Do this with using personal accounts. This will give you a little leeway to make some mistakes without damaging your brand.

When it comes to finally participating on behalf of your brand, there’s one simple rule that I like to follow when figuring out what to do or say and what not to do or say. The “Golden Rule” tells us that we should treat others as we’d like to be treated. My social media “Platinum Rule” is basically the same, but with a key difference. Here it is: Act as if YOU are watching. That’s right. You. If you’ve gotten this far in getting your idea approved, you’re probably pretty smart and know a bit about marketing. You’ve seen the good, the bad, and the ugly. You’ve seen it as a marketer and as a consumer. So, here’s what you do. Take a look at what you’re planning on doing and think how you’d honestly react if another brand did the same thing. Would you roll your eyes and quickly log out or would you find it interesting and useful? If you’re honest with yourself, you can be your best critic here, but it requires being honest. Bring your normal dose of skepticism and cynicism just as you would as a consumer and apply that to what you’re about to do. How does it fit?

If you still can’t tell, then send it to me and I’ll give you the honest truth.

7. Go offline

After you’ve had some success and are starting to get a following and some good reactions from your social media efforts its time to take it offline. I know that sounds like counterintuitive advice after all the effort you’ve put in to get online, but hear me out. I’m not saying to abandon your online efforts. Rather, I’m saying you should augment them with some offline work as well. While the relationships we form solely online can be useful, there’s still no substitute for meeting in person like humans have for hundreds of thousands of years. It’s simpler to communicate and often easier to build deeper levels of trust since you can see and read someone’s behavior and create deeper mental connections as well.

That’s not to say that you should invite all of your Twitter followers over to your house or all of your brand’s Facebook Fans to your headquarters, but from time to time you can bring together several key influencers from your network for a face-to-face, in-depth discussion. You can do this when you travel to different cities by putting together a “Tweetup” or making it a formal meeting with other members of your company. Either way, know that you can only go so far in a relationship with another person without meeting that person in real life.

8. Track your progress

I won’t get into how specifically to measure your social media efforts here, that’s a series of separate posts. The bottom line is that you need to measure your efforts opposite pre-defined goals. The pre-defined part is the key here. It’s possible to meet just about any goal that you come up with after the fact, so those don’t count. Whatever you choose to use as objectives for your efforts, define them ahead of time and create a plan to track your progress against them. This will allow you to not only gauge success and failure, but also to make adjustments while you’re still running the program. Keep the good (and add more) and throw out the bad. A good measurement plan will give you guidance on how to make changes on the fly.

If you’re looking for some advice on how to measure ROI for social media, check out this Mashable post that contains a ton of great resources. If you’re stuck on how to measure your social media efforts, here are 100 different options.

9. Automate

Last but not least…automation. While some of you are breathing a sigh of relief that the hard work is over, I’m not talking about that kind of automation. I’m not recommending you simply run your RSS feeds into all your social media profiles and walk away. Quite the opposite. What I mean by automate is to make social media participation automatic. There are three key parts to this: integrate social media as a standard marketing channel, implement tools that make it easier for more people to participate and manage, and make participation a standard part of your day.

As I’ve already said, don’t create a social media strategy, but rather add it to your list of tactics to deliver the strategies you already have in place. Use tools like CoTweet for Twitter to allow multiple people to use and manage one account (and provide better service to consumers). Lastly, you’re participation (and your brand’s) can’t be a one time affair. It needs to be ongoing. The best way to do this is to make it a standard part of your day. If you’re one of those people that only look at email at set times of the day, set a time for social media as well. If you aren’t one of these people, then find another set time. This will both ensure that you actually do it and also limit the amount of time, so you aren’t spending too much. Everything in moderation.

Those are the nine steps. Follow them and you’ll be among the best. I’ve created a PowerPoint presentation that covers the information in this post, so that you can share it with your colleagues at your next company meeting (or whatever you think makes sense). It’s basically the hugely abridged version of this post. If you’re interested in getting a copy,head over to the Dose of Digital Fan Page on Facebook. Fans get all the content from this blog plus sneak previews and exclusive content like this PowerPoint. You can get the link to download the presentation right from the Dose of Digital Facebook Fan page (check out the Wall).

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »