Social Media Wiki

10 Things I’d Like to Start Hearing About Pharma Social Media

Dose of Digital Mini White Paper

About a week and a half ago, I wrote a post called “10 Things I’m Tired of Hearing About Pharma Social Media.” As you might imagine, it stirred up a little controversy (check out the comments and discussion at the end of the post). The big concern that some people had was that if we stop talking about these “10 Things” then some “beginners” in the area of social media will suffer. So, in response, I put together a post called “The Beginner’s Guide to Pharma Social Media.” It included a ton of resources for any beginners who really want to catch up. I also promised that I’d write the positive version of the “10 Things” post by focusing  more positive areas. That’s why today you’re getting “10 Things I’d Like to Start Hearing About Pharma Social Media.”

These are the areas where I think the conversation should be headed and where social media may truly benefit healthcare overall and also be a viable communications channel for pharma and healthcare companies. I wrote the first “10 things” based on near direct quotes I’ve heard from people regarding pharma social media. I’ll do the same here, but these are quotes I’ve yet to hear, but would like to.

10 Things I’d Like to Hear About Pharma Social Media

1. “Participating in social media is a risk for us, but we’re going to do it anyway because we think it’s the right thing for patients.”

Notice that I didn’t say,” the right thing for our market share.” It might very well be beneficial for market share, but that can’t be the only reason why you get involved. You have to get into it because there are people that can benefit from your knowledge about your products. I’m specifically thinking about cases, for example, where there is dangerously inaccurate information about your products published on a disscusion forum. If some random person on a forum somewhere says that it’s “probably” safe to take 10 of your pills at once and you know that this will kill someone, shouldn’t you say something? Here’s how I explained how pharma companies can do this in an objective and beneficial way during my FDA public hearing testimony.

2. “We’ve got a rock-solid measurement plan in place for our social media efforts.”

This would, of course, be in complete opposition to comments like: “there’s no way to effectively measure social media efforts.” There’s a way to measure everything. I explained this in the first “10 Things” post and recommended that you visit Olivier Blanchard’s site, which is completely dedicated to this topic, and read everything. Bottom line, if you can track it, you can measure it. If you can measure it, you can get to an ROI (or certainly very close to it and much closer than you are now). Here are 100 things you can start tracking right now. Don’t throw your hands up in the air until you’ve checked out every one of these.

3. “Our social media efforts are completely integrated into the rest of our marketing efforts.”

Ahh, music to my ears. As I’ve always said, don’t create a “social media strategy.” Create a great brand strategy and use social media as one of the tactics to deliver on those strategies. Nothing more, nothing less. When I say integrated, I’m not just talking about integrating with your website or even all of your digital marketing activities. I’m talking about everything. Online, offline. Remotely, in person. PR team to regulatory team. Social media can potentially support all of your communication efforts, but it has to make sense. No one should look at something you’re doing in social media and think, “where in the hell did this come from?”

4. “We’re using social media to prevent another Vioxx [or insert similar drug pulled from the market because of serious safety issues and leading to massive legal issues].”

Yes, this can be done. It’s not simple, but it can be done. Today.

For example, Google is able to predict with precision the future flu infection rates simply based on search terms and volume changes. Hear me discuss this in the following presentation:

Companies like CureTogether are starting to predict disease correlation and drug efficacy based on user-provided data with only a few hundred people in a database. A comprehensive monitoring plan with some powerful statistical analysis could pick out problems before they start. Simply explained…if your new drug is suddenly being talked about with keywords like “heart attack,” “chest pain,” or the like and you’ve never seen this in your clinical trials, you might have signal that something is wrong. It doesn’t mean that there is for sure, but it’s a valuable “canary in the coalmine” that could prevent a major issue.

But first, you’ll have to do some monitoring. A minor detail, I suppose.

5. “We’ve trained everyone in our company on social media and have opened up access to social media sites completely.”

I mean, seriously…you’re going to do this eventually anyway. Why not do it now? Pfizer just did. At least, they did the latter part. Either one would be a good start, but both would be a big step forward. I’m not sure how company leadership can ask their teams to deliver in “emerging” channels (I cringe to think people still call social media “emerging”) and yet block access to these channels. It’s having the exact same impact that preventing your scientists from reading new research papers would have on your R&D. Not good.

Yes, you’ll need to have some rules in place. And, no, productivity won’t suffer. If someone wants to slack off, there are plenty of places online where they can do it that don’t fit in the social media category. If anything, expect it to have a positive impact on morale, which may lead to better productivity.

6. “Social media is how we’re providing meaningful customer service to patients and doctors.”

Yes, it is that simple. Look at it this way: you already provide great service via your call centers, why not provide the same service using a slightly more modern communication technology called the Internet? For example, when someone sends out this tweet (which I promise is a real)…

…maybe you should respond. But how can you respond to this question effectively in just 140 characters? Answer: you can’t. But you should answer and point people in the right direction. Here’s what AstraZeneca responded with:

If people saw the complaint, give them a chance to see the solution as well. Chances are it’ll spread more through social media than the complaint.

7. “Social media has given us a chance to find our biggest brand advocates, so we can start talking with them.”

Yes, even pharma brands have big advocates. Of course, it also has big detractors. Once you get involved in social media, expect to see some of the latter. For an example, review John Mack’s post: “Patient “Unadvocate” Lays Siege to sanofi-aventis VOICES Facebook Page. Where’s S-A’s Social Media VOICE?” John narrates the story of how a Facebook page ran by a division of sanofi-aventis was barraged with negative comments about their chemotherapy, Taxotere, and its side effects. Without going into many more details or discussing how sanofi-aventis should have handled this, I do want to add in one wrinkle.

Instead of the page being dominated by anti-Taxotere comments, what if the opposite happened? There are certainly side effects with this treatment, but there’s also a huge benefit for many people. I’d venture to say that there are a lot of people out their that owe their lives to Taxotere. I’m also sure that these people would be happy to explain that to the world if they thought there was a reason, knew where and when their opinion would be helpful, and had an easy way to share their thoughts. Of course, there isn’t any easier way than Facebook, but the other parts are a bit more of a challenge. Or are they?

If you knew who these advocates were before there was a crisis, then you could turn to them and ask that they weigh in on the situation when something does happen. If you do this successfully, then you don’t have to fight these battles yourself, you let both sides of the story explain it in their own words. You’re free to add in your perspective to the discussion, but which will have more impact on the public’s hearts and minds: your “company line” about the product or an impassioned story from someone who was truly saved by your product? Get to know these people now and get them ready because I’m sure you’ll need them at some point. You can’t try to find them once the crisis starts. It’s too late then.

8. “We’re using our social media resources to do something great for patient advocacy groups.”

Let’s face it. The pharma industry has a lot of resources at its disposal. That’s one of the big criticisms from the public. They don’t like to see their prescription prices increase while they also see more and more commercials for drugs on TV. To them, the solution is obvious: cut the commercials and you can cut the price. Of course, these commercials aren’t cheap; a lot of resources go into making and airing them. At the same time, pharma and healthcare companies have talented people with deep knowledge in specialized areas like government regulations, marketing, pricing and access, managed care, and, of course, medical. And when pharma companies go public with something, people hear about it.

Why not use all of these resources for something more than marketing? Why not use it to create something that’s bigger than your products? Advocacy groups can use your help and you’re looking for a way to reach patients. Instead of figuring out all the legal issues with marketing your product via social media, why not use social media simply to help an advocacy group with their efforts? The benefit to pharma and healthcare companies should be clear. This eliminates many of the legal issues everyone worries about (no fair balance required if you’re not talking about a product), improves the company’s skill and knowledge about social media, and might actually generate some positive PR. Oh yes, and it’s helping an important cause. Some companies have dabbled in this a little bit (see examples on the Pharma and Healthcare Social Media Wiki), but most try desperately to connect the program with their product. Resist this temptation for once and see what happens.

9. “Social media is a great opportunity to hear directly from our patients so that we can improve our products.”

You wouldn’t be the first company in the world to do this. Starbucks and Dell are two that have used this concept effectively. They let people submit their suggestions for improving a product, the public votes on their favorites, and then the company actually does those things that have risen to the top of the list. Think about how great this is for everyone. Customers get a place for their voices to be heard and can see that the company is listening and taking their suggestions seriously. The company gets this positive sentiment, but it also gets product engineering, marketing, production, and operations advice…for free. The next big innovation might not come from your lab, but rather your customers.

For pharma, this might mean a suggestion on how to better explain how your product works, a formulation recommendation, or something simple, but with a major impact. Consider when J&J added different color options to it’s popular OneTouch blood glucose monitors. Sales went through the roof all because of a different color shell. While I don’t know for sure, I’d venture to guess that this idea came from a diabetic somewhere. Create a process around this concept and you’ll have a continuous stream of new ideas and innovations.

10. “We’re moved way past the Dose of Digital ’10 Things I’m Tired of Hearing About in Social Media.’”

That right. Until everyone is saying this, then we’re still going to be stuck. I do mean everyone. It’s not enough for one or two companies to move forward. Everyone needs to move forward together. We’ll all learn more together, have a bigger impact on patient health, press government regulations, and find new approaches that benefit everyone. And we’ll do it all more quickly than if we each go at it alone.

__________

So that’s the new list of what you should start talking about in pharma and healthcare social media. If you didn’t like the idea of not talking about certain topics, that’s okay, but then you do have to promise to start talking about these topics at the same time.

Subscribe to the Dose of Digital RSS Feed


Join
Dose of Digital on Facebook for exclusive content and sneak previews.



Ready to hire the folks behind Dose of Digital? Contact us.

Possibly related posts (auto-generated):

  1. 10 Things I’m Tired of Hearing About Pharma Social Media
  2. Pharma Should Forget About Social Media Monitoring
  3. 9 Simple Steps to Getting Started in Social Media


Print This Post Print This Post

  • http://www.worldofdtcmarketing.com Richard Meyer

    Great list Jonathan. Having worked with and for many healthcare organizations I can honestly say that the issues facing pharma marketers start with the politics and structure of the organizations. It starts with the CEO who has given too much attention to Wall Street and not enough attention to patients. It continues with legal and regulatory people who are risk adverse and don’t understand that by being so risk adverse they are missing a huge opportunity to impact behaviors. It also stems from matrix organizations that spread decision making until nobody is the key stakeholder and a marketing idea becomes so diluted that it becomes less and less effective.

    We learn from failure but it seems that too many people are not willing to try new things and fail in an atmosphere where pharma is shedding jobs again and again.But what we do, impact the health of patients, is too important to let the status quo remain intact. Instead of focusing on complying with management as long-term strategy for getting more stuff and being more secure , you have a chance to describe a powerful vision for the future of DTC marketing and actually be part of the change. The changes in DTC marketing that you can implement isn’t about doing what has always been done it’s about acknowledgement that marketing is open marketing that is shared with consumers.

    I keep reading about new iPhone apps that the pharm world is developing but I really wonder if they were developed for the purpose of a press release and a performance review or really providing patients with a tool that they can use to manager their health. Right now people are downloading a lot of apps for their smartphones but they are also deleting a lot them after a week or two as they struggle to keep the ones that provide the best use and fit into their lives. When I did some research earlier this year we found that, depending on the disease state, a lot of patients did not want smartphone apps that reminded them they “were different” and needed something to stay healthy.

    As Seth says in his book “it’s entirely possible that once you choose to become indispensable, you will not longer be loved”. That is a scary thought because a lot of people get reviewed by what co-workers say about them and if you chose not to be loved you can bet you are going to hear it come review time.

    If DTC marketing is to evolve, change and remain relevant to patients and consumers it needs passionate Linchpins. These are people who exert emotional labor because they love what they do, these are people who spend a lot of time trying to get others to understand how the marketplace has changed. It is not people who go to endless meetings to quantify and justify their budgets. The passion is not making money or changing titles it’s knowing that you made a difference in the organization and patients lives. It’s believing in your product enough to want to talk to someone one on one to tell them just how good it is. It’s being an artist which is the ability to change people with your ideas and work, too create stories that people can relate to and change the marketplace.

    I don’t think we have the luxury of “learning to crawl before we walk”. The drug industry, and DTC marketing as well, is at a crossroads and we have to chose the path that makes the best use of consumers time and meets the brand and business objectives.
    Those that take the greatest risk will get the greatest rewards. A patient who is able to use your product and live a more normal life is one of the best rewards that I can think of. The question is what risk are you willing to take ?

  • http://topsy.com/www.doseofdigital.com/2010/07/10-like-starthear-pharma-social-media/?utm_source=pingback&utm_campaign=L2 Tweets that mention 10 Things I’d Like to Start Hearing About Pharma Social Media | Dose of Digital – Digital Marketing in Pharma and Healthcare — Topsy.com

    [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Jonathan Richman, Andrew Spong, Korlarp S. and others. Korlarp S. said: RT @jonmrich 10 Things I'd Like to Start Hearing About #Pharma Social Media http://su.pr/2HQWtZ #sm #hcsm [...]

  • http://prforpharma.com/ Chris Iafolla

    Thanks for putting this together Jonathan–it’s a comprehensive list of what the pharma social media conversation should be honing in on. I particularly like that you started with a patient-centric message. As you said, the primary goal should not be to expand market share or enhance the bottom line. These are merely byproducts of a well-formed social media strategy that keys in on the patient and providing access to better information. It’s something I have been harping on endlessly: Starting from “How do we make money?” and working to how it will impact the patient is a quick route to failure. If you flip that model and start with the patient—the money will come.

  • http://www.doseofdigital.com Jonathan Richman

    I think you’ll start seeing some companies taking risks in social media in the near future. It’ll be in places where the FDA will have a tough time arguing that what they did was against “patient health,” which is what they are supposed to be protecting. For example, if a pharma company makes a corrective post on a forum thread that contains dangerously, inaccurate information about one of their products, but doesn’t include all 5 pages of fair balance, should they get penalized? Letter of the law says yes, but spirit of the law probably says no. We’ll see.

  • http://www.doseofdigital.com Jonathan Richman

    I’m with you. Maybe there will be money-making opportunities later, but not now. Let’s not forget that most companies, in any industry, haven’t really come up with a good way of making money here. Why should pharma expect it right away? For me, if they can fix their PR perceptions just a bit, it’ll be worth all of their investment.

  • http://www.twitter.com/johanna_sez Johanna

    Started laughing at point 2 already… Probably isn’t such a good sign… But I’ll never stop hoping that one beautiful we’ll get there. I’ll try my very best!

  • http://Www.wehatesocialmedia.com Neil Crump

    What a great post and one that we all collectively should work toward achieving. The leading companies need to be championed and encouraged. We need to share best practice and get folk aware of hubs like the wiki on this site to highlight what is done. I believe that soon the floodgate will open and we need to work with pharma to help them prepare. Open access from their own desks, clear policy in terms of governance and an education in sm are vital. What we don’t want is a torrent of poor practice which would set the whole agenda back years. Let’s all move this forward roll up our sleeves and get on with it.

  • http://www.lisastockwell.com Lisa Stockwell

    This is great content and presents a really cogent argument. I hope you’ve emailed or mailed it to pharma CEOs and marketing directors (since we can assume most are not yet listening in on social media channels).

    Another way to phrase #4 (or perhaps an addition to that point) is “We’ve got control of the conversation and don’t have to work from a defensive position when news about one of our products hits the market.”

  • http://www.doseofdigital.com Jonathan Richman

    Good idea about emailing to all the pharma CEOs. If you have their email addresses, send them along. I’ll try to dig them up on my end. Thanks for the kind words.

    I think your #4 is probably related to a few of the ones I’ve listed. It’s certainly related to #7, where I suggest that you find your brand advocates today and not before it’s too late.

  • http://www.whatsyourdigitaliq.com/2010/07/19/shareworthy-four-cant-miss-clicks/ Shareworthy: Four “can’t miss” clicks | What's Your Digital iQ?

    [...] do that!” comes this great find from fellow blogger Jon Richman. In his mini-white paper 10 Things I’d Like to Start Hearing About Pharma Social Media, Jon shares this very cool search and response Twitter campaign by [...]

  • http://www.gsw-w.com/blog/2010/07/19/shareworthy-four-%e2%80%9ccan%e2%80%99t-miss%e2%80%9d-clicks/ Shareworthy: Four “can’t miss” clicks « Brand Liberators Blog

    [...] do that!” comes this great find from fellow blogger Jon Richman. In his mini-white paper 10 Things I’d Like to Start Hearing About Pharma Social Media, Jon shares this very cool search and response Twitter campaign by [...]

  • http://epatient.wordpress.com epatientgr

    “We’re using our social media resources to do something great for patient advocacy groups.” You give agreat example to pharma on what to do with patient advocacy groups. The problem is that pharma patient advocacy execs are so stuck in old fashioned activities (e.g. hosted promotional events) that it is very difficult to make them listen to anything a little bit different. So, you suggest that pharma takes the initiative to think more creatively in offering meaningful support to advocacy groups, but it is also possible that some advocacy groups come up with creative ideas out of the common path. How can they convince pharma that it is worth spending money on their “disruptive” proposal?

  • http://www.doseofdigital.com Jonathan Richman

    Interesting point of view that I hadn’t considered, which you point out: “The problem is that pharma patient advocacy execs are so stuck in old fashioned activities (e.g. hosted promotional events) that it is very difficult to make them listen to anything a little bit different.” So, it’s not just the pharma companies standing in the way, but the people who run these advocacy groups. I suppose in that way these senior people aren’t much different than the senior people at a lot of companies. It takes a bit of a grassroots effort in these cases for something to change. This may mean a more junior person who knows the value of the space trying something different.

    I actually don’t think the issue is this: “How can they convince pharma that it is worth spending money on their “disruptive” proposal?” I think that in the right venue and context pharma companies would be open to these ideas. They are, despite popular sentiment, looking for new ideas and love the chance to be the first to do something (assuming it’s not too out there). The challenge is getting the idea in front of the right people. I think both groups are responsible for making this happen though. As it stands today, nothing will happen if neither side makes the first move.