<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: One More Reason Pharma Needs Product Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/</link>
	<description>Improving Healthcare Through Digital Technology -- Effectively using digital technology and social media in pharma and healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Richman</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/#comment-1911</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=1332#comment-1911</guid>
		<description>Ben, No question the regulatory issues is what&#039;s stopping pharma companies from doing product reviews. They would be extremely hard to do the right way, but they may be worth the effort. Product reviews drive additional conversions in every other industry. Could they have the same effect in pharma? I don&#039;t know the answer for sure, of course. Moderating the reviews would be critical, but it would need to be transparent enough to ensure that negative reviews aren&#039;t patently deleted, allowing only the positive to be posted. I think you could easily (if transparent about it) delete reviews that clearly have nothing to do with the product like in your example. Perhaps having a third party company manage this for you would be a way to do this in a transparent, unbiased way.

Regarding the idea that people would feel mislead, I agree IF I somehow said that Nexium was a home remedy or I didn&#039;t mention the product and only said, &quot;Click here for a home remedy for heartburn.&quot; (say, for example, in a paid search ad). I&#039;m not recommending that. Let&#039;s say Nexium does optimize its site for &quot;heartburn remedy.&quot; When Google provides the search results, the title of the website (Discover NEXIUM (esomeprazole magnesium)&#8212; The Purple Pill™ that offers 24-hour heartburn relief) would appear and also a bit of the meta description. So before someone clicks, they know it&#039;s Nexium. That&#039;s not misleading. On the other hand if I did an unbranded page that was about home remedies and then when you click on it, you find it&#039;s all about Nexium, that&#039;s misleading. 

Let&#039;s also remember that &quot;home remedy for heartburn&quot; and &quot;heartburn remedy&quot; are completely different things. You&#039;re assuming that when people say &quot;remedy&quot; they mean an at-home, non-pharma treatment. That might be true or might not. The definition of &quot;remedy&quot; in regards to health is this: &quot;a medicine or therapy that cures disease or relieve pain.&quot; That doesn&#039;t say &quot;at-home&quot; or &quot;natural.&quot; But maybe it means &quot;at-home&quot; or &quot;natural&quot; to patients. If it does, to your point, then I would just get a click because they wouldn&#039;t be interested in my Rx treatment. I&#039;m also more interested in conversions, so if I knew this (and I don&#039;t for sure) then I would ignore this term and look for something different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, No question the regulatory issues is what&#8217;s stopping pharma companies from doing product reviews. They would be extremely hard to do the right way, but they may be worth the effort. Product reviews drive additional conversions in every other industry. Could they have the same effect in pharma? I don&#8217;t know the answer for sure, of course. Moderating the reviews would be critical, but it would need to be transparent enough to ensure that negative reviews aren&#8217;t patently deleted, allowing only the positive to be posted. I think you could easily (if transparent about it) delete reviews that clearly have nothing to do with the product like in your example. Perhaps having a third party company manage this for you would be a way to do this in a transparent, unbiased way.</p>
<p>Regarding the idea that people would feel mislead, I agree IF I somehow said that Nexium was a home remedy or I didn&#8217;t mention the product and only said, &#8220;Click here for a home remedy for heartburn.&#8221; (say, for example, in a paid search ad). I&#8217;m not recommending that. Let&#8217;s say Nexium does optimize its site for &#8220;heartburn remedy.&#8221; When Google provides the search results, the title of the website (Discover NEXIUM (esomeprazole magnesium)&mdash; The Purple Pill™ that offers 24-hour heartburn relief) would appear and also a bit of the meta description. So before someone clicks, they know it&#8217;s Nexium. That&#8217;s not misleading. On the other hand if I did an unbranded page that was about home remedies and then when you click on it, you find it&#8217;s all about Nexium, that&#8217;s misleading. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s also remember that &#8220;home remedy for heartburn&#8221; and &#8220;heartburn remedy&#8221; are completely different things. You&#8217;re assuming that when people say &#8220;remedy&#8221; they mean an at-home, non-pharma treatment. That might be true or might not. The definition of &#8220;remedy&#8221; in regards to health is this: &#8220;a medicine or therapy that cures disease or relieve pain.&#8221; That doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;at-home&#8221; or &#8220;natural.&#8221; But maybe it means &#8220;at-home&#8221; or &#8220;natural&#8221; to patients. If it does, to your point, then I would just get a click because they wouldn&#8217;t be interested in my Rx treatment. I&#8217;m also more interested in conversions, so if I knew this (and I don&#8217;t for sure) then I would ignore this term and look for something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Richman</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/#comment-9144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=1332#comment-9144</guid>
		<description>Ben, No question the regulatory issues is what&#039;s stopping pharma companies from doing product reviews. They would be extremely hard to do the right way, but they may be worth the effort. Product reviews drive additional conversions in every other industry. Could they have the same effect in pharma? I don&#039;t know the answer for sure, of course. Moderating the reviews would be critical, but it would need to be transparent enough to ensure that negative reviews aren&#039;t patently deleted, allowing only the positive to be posted. I think you could easily (if transparent about it) delete reviews that clearly have nothing to do with the product like in your example. Perhaps having a third party company manage this for you would be a way to do this in a transparent, unbiased way.

Regarding the idea that people would feel mislead, I agree IF I somehow said that Nexium was a home remedy or I didn&#039;t mention the product and only said, &quot;Click here for a home remedy for heartburn.&quot; (say, for example, in a paid search ad). I&#039;m not recommending that. Let&#039;s say Nexium does optimize its site for &quot;heartburn remedy.&quot; When Google provides the search results, the title of the website (Discover NEXIUM (esomeprazole magnesium)&#8212; The Purple Pill™ that offers 24-hour heartburn relief) would appear and also a bit of the meta description. So before someone clicks, they know it&#039;s Nexium. That&#039;s not misleading. On the other hand if I did an unbranded page that was about home remedies and then when you click on it, you find it&#039;s all about Nexium, that&#039;s misleading. 

Let&#039;s also remember that &quot;home remedy for heartburn&quot; and &quot;heartburn remedy&quot; are completely different things. You&#039;re assuming that when people say &quot;remedy&quot; they mean an at-home, non-pharma treatment. That might be true or might not. The definition of &quot;remedy&quot; in regards to health is this: &quot;a medicine or therapy that cures disease or relieve pain.&quot; That doesn&#039;t say &quot;at-home&quot; or &quot;natural.&quot; But maybe it means &quot;at-home&quot; or &quot;natural&quot; to patients. If it does, to your point, then I would just get a click because they wouldn&#039;t be interested in my Rx treatment. I&#039;m also more interested in conversions, so if I knew this (and I don&#039;t for sure) then I would ignore this term and look for something different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, No question the regulatory issues is what&#8217;s stopping pharma companies from doing product reviews. They would be extremely hard to do the right way, but they may be worth the effort. Product reviews drive additional conversions in every other industry. Could they have the same effect in pharma? I don&#8217;t know the answer for sure, of course. Moderating the reviews would be critical, but it would need to be transparent enough to ensure that negative reviews aren&#8217;t patently deleted, allowing only the positive to be posted. I think you could easily (if transparent about it) delete reviews that clearly have nothing to do with the product like in your example. Perhaps having a third party company manage this for you would be a way to do this in a transparent, unbiased way.</p>
<p>Regarding the idea that people would feel mislead, I agree IF I somehow said that Nexium was a home remedy or I didn&#8217;t mention the product and only said, &#8220;Click here for a home remedy for heartburn.&#8221; (say, for example, in a paid search ad). I&#8217;m not recommending that. Let&#8217;s say Nexium does optimize its site for &#8220;heartburn remedy.&#8221; When Google provides the search results, the title of the website (Discover NEXIUM (esomeprazole magnesium)&mdash; The Purple Pill™ that offers 24-hour heartburn relief) would appear and also a bit of the meta description. So before someone clicks, they know it&#8217;s Nexium. That&#8217;s not misleading. On the other hand if I did an unbranded page that was about home remedies and then when you click on it, you find it&#8217;s all about Nexium, that&#8217;s misleading. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s also remember that &#8220;home remedy for heartburn&#8221; and &#8220;heartburn remedy&#8221; are completely different things. You&#8217;re assuming that when people say &#8220;remedy&#8221; they mean an at-home, non-pharma treatment. That might be true or might not. The definition of &#8220;remedy&#8221; in regards to health is this: &#8220;a medicine or therapy that cures disease or relieve pain.&#8221; That doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;at-home&#8221; or &#8220;natural.&#8221; But maybe it means &#8220;at-home&#8221; or &#8220;natural&#8221; to patients. If it does, to your point, then I would just get a click because they wouldn&#8217;t be interested in my Rx treatment. I&#8217;m also more interested in conversions, so if I knew this (and I don&#8217;t for sure) then I would ignore this term and look for something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Richman</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/#comment-9145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Aug 2009 02:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=1332#comment-9145</guid>
		<description>Ben, No question the regulatory issues is what&#039;s stopping pharma companies from doing product reviews. They would be extremely hard to do the right way, but they may be worth the effort. Product reviews drive additional conversions in every other industry. Could they have the same effect in pharma? I don&#039;t know the answer for sure, of course. Moderating the reviews would be critical, but it would need to be transparent enough to ensure that negative reviews aren&#039;t patently deleted, allowing only the positive to be posted. I think you could easily (if transparent about it) delete reviews that clearly have nothing to do with the product like in your example. Perhaps having a third party company manage this for you would be a way to do this in a transparent, unbiased way.

Regarding the idea that people would feel mislead, I agree IF I somehow said that Nexium was a home remedy or I didn&#039;t mention the product and only said, &quot;Click here for a home remedy for heartburn.&quot; (say, for example, in a paid search ad). I&#039;m not recommending that. Let&#039;s say Nexium does optimize its site for &quot;heartburn remedy.&quot; When Google provides the search results, the title of the website (Discover NEXIUM (esomeprazole magnesium)&#8212; The Purple Pill™ that offers 24-hour heartburn relief) would appear and also a bit of the meta description. So before someone clicks, they know it&#039;s Nexium. That&#039;s not misleading. On the other hand if I did an unbranded page that was about home remedies and then when you click on it, you find it&#039;s all about Nexium, that&#039;s misleading. 

Let&#039;s also remember that &quot;home remedy for heartburn&quot; and &quot;heartburn remedy&quot; are completely different things. You&#039;re assuming that when people say &quot;remedy&quot; they mean an at-home, non-pharma treatment. That might be true or might not. The definition of &quot;remedy&quot; in regards to health is this: &quot;a medicine or therapy that cures disease or relieve pain.&quot; That doesn&#039;t say &quot;at-home&quot; or &quot;natural.&quot; But maybe it means &quot;at-home&quot; or &quot;natural&quot; to patients. If it does, to your point, then I would just get a click because they wouldn&#039;t be interested in my Rx treatment. I&#039;m also more interested in conversions, so if I knew this (and I don&#039;t for sure) then I would ignore this term and look for something different.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, No question the regulatory issues is what&#8217;s stopping pharma companies from doing product reviews. They would be extremely hard to do the right way, but they may be worth the effort. Product reviews drive additional conversions in every other industry. Could they have the same effect in pharma? I don&#8217;t know the answer for sure, of course. Moderating the reviews would be critical, but it would need to be transparent enough to ensure that negative reviews aren&#8217;t patently deleted, allowing only the positive to be posted. I think you could easily (if transparent about it) delete reviews that clearly have nothing to do with the product like in your example. Perhaps having a third party company manage this for you would be a way to do this in a transparent, unbiased way.</p>
<p>Regarding the idea that people would feel mislead, I agree IF I somehow said that Nexium was a home remedy or I didn&#8217;t mention the product and only said, &#8220;Click here for a home remedy for heartburn.&#8221; (say, for example, in a paid search ad). I&#8217;m not recommending that. Let&#8217;s say Nexium does optimize its site for &#8220;heartburn remedy.&#8221; When Google provides the search results, the title of the website (Discover NEXIUM (esomeprazole magnesium)&mdash; The Purple Pill™ that offers 24-hour heartburn relief) would appear and also a bit of the meta description. So before someone clicks, they know it&#8217;s Nexium. That&#8217;s not misleading. On the other hand if I did an unbranded page that was about home remedies and then when you click on it, you find it&#8217;s all about Nexium, that&#8217;s misleading. </p>
<p>Let&#8217;s also remember that &#8220;home remedy for heartburn&#8221; and &#8220;heartburn remedy&#8221; are completely different things. You&#8217;re assuming that when people say &#8220;remedy&#8221; they mean an at-home, non-pharma treatment. That might be true or might not. The definition of &#8220;remedy&#8221; in regards to health is this: &#8220;a medicine or therapy that cures disease or relieve pain.&#8221; That doesn&#8217;t say &#8220;at-home&#8221; or &#8220;natural.&#8221; But maybe it means &#8220;at-home&#8221; or &#8220;natural&#8221; to patients. If it does, to your point, then I would just get a click because they wouldn&#8217;t be interested in my Rx treatment. I&#8217;m also more interested in conversions, so if I knew this (and I don&#8217;t for sure) then I would ignore this term and look for something different.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/#comment-1910</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=1332#comment-1910</guid>
		<description>Certainly the link I presented is an extreme case of being misleading. But one of the main problems with the digital industry is we focus too much on clicks and not on conversions. If someone was searching for home remedies and ended up on the Nexium site, they would feel misled. The point I was trying to make is that search engines exist to give us relevant information based on what we searched for. But I think I got too caught up on the semantics. (And a little bit off of your main topic.) Clearly, having product reviews would help with search engine optimization. The main issue you will have in the pharmaceutical industry is accountability. Let&#039;s say someone posted a review about Nexium on a website that was hosted by AstraZeneca. In this review they claim that they took Nexium, and woke up in the hospital.  Turns out they tried to commit suicide while on Nexium.  Nexium would then be required to report this to the FDA, even if the story makes no sense and has no relevance to the side effects of their product. Nexium would risk damaging their brand. Is that a risk they are willing to take?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly the link I presented is an extreme case of being misleading. But one of the main problems with the digital industry is we focus too much on clicks and not on conversions. If someone was searching for home remedies and ended up on the Nexium site, they would feel misled. The point I was trying to make is that search engines exist to give us relevant information based on what we searched for. But I think I got too caught up on the semantics. (And a little bit off of your main topic.) Clearly, having product reviews would help with search engine optimization. The main issue you will have in the pharmaceutical industry is accountability. Let&#8217;s say someone posted a review about Nexium on a website that was hosted by AstraZeneca. In this review they claim that they took Nexium, and woke up in the hospital.  Turns out they tried to commit suicide while on Nexium.  Nexium would then be required to report this to the FDA, even if the story makes no sense and has no relevance to the side effects of their product. Nexium would risk damaging their brand. Is that a risk they are willing to take?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/#comment-9142</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=1332#comment-9142</guid>
		<description>Certainly the link I presented is an extreme case of being misleading. But one of the main problems with the digital industry is we focus too much on clicks and not on conversions. If someone was searching for home remedies and ended up on the Nexium site, they would feel misled. The point I was trying to make is that search engines exist to give us relevant information based on what we searched for. But I think I got too caught up on the semantics. (And a little bit off of your main topic.) Clearly, having product reviews would help with search engine optimization. The main issue you will have in the pharmaceutical industry is accountability. Let&#039;s say someone posted a review about Nexium on a website that was hosted by AstraZeneca. In this review they claim that they took Nexium, and woke up in the hospital.  Turns out they tried to commit suicide while on Nexium.  Nexium would then be required to report this to the FDA, even if the story makes no sense and has no relevance to the side effects of their product. Nexium would risk damaging their brand. Is that a risk they are willing to take?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly the link I presented is an extreme case of being misleading. But one of the main problems with the digital industry is we focus too much on clicks and not on conversions. If someone was searching for home remedies and ended up on the Nexium site, they would feel misled. The point I was trying to make is that search engines exist to give us relevant information based on what we searched for. But I think I got too caught up on the semantics. (And a little bit off of your main topic.) Clearly, having product reviews would help with search engine optimization. The main issue you will have in the pharmaceutical industry is accountability. Let&#8217;s say someone posted a review about Nexium on a website that was hosted by AstraZeneca. In this review they claim that they took Nexium, and woke up in the hospital.  Turns out they tried to commit suicide while on Nexium.  Nexium would then be required to report this to the FDA, even if the story makes no sense and has no relevance to the side effects of their product. Nexium would risk damaging their brand. Is that a risk they are willing to take?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/#comment-9143</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=1332#comment-9143</guid>
		<description>Certainly the link I presented is an extreme case of being misleading. But one of the main problems with the digital industry is we focus too much on clicks and not on conversions. If someone was searching for home remedies and ended up on the Nexium site, they would feel misled. The point I was trying to make is that search engines exist to give us relevant information based on what we searched for. But I think I got too caught up on the semantics. (And a little bit off of your main topic.) Clearly, having product reviews would help with search engine optimization. The main issue you will have in the pharmaceutical industry is accountability. Let&#039;s say someone posted a review about Nexium on a website that was hosted by AstraZeneca. In this review they claim that they took Nexium, and woke up in the hospital.  Turns out they tried to commit suicide while on Nexium.  Nexium would then be required to report this to the FDA, even if the story makes no sense and has no relevance to the side effects of their product. Nexium would risk damaging their brand. Is that a risk they are willing to take?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Certainly the link I presented is an extreme case of being misleading. But one of the main problems with the digital industry is we focus too much on clicks and not on conversions. If someone was searching for home remedies and ended up on the Nexium site, they would feel misled. The point I was trying to make is that search engines exist to give us relevant information based on what we searched for. But I think I got too caught up on the semantics. (And a little bit off of your main topic.) Clearly, having product reviews would help with search engine optimization. The main issue you will have in the pharmaceutical industry is accountability. Let&#8217;s say someone posted a review about Nexium on a website that was hosted by AstraZeneca. In this review they claim that they took Nexium, and woke up in the hospital.  Turns out they tried to commit suicide while on Nexium.  Nexium would then be required to report this to the FDA, even if the story makes no sense and has no relevance to the side effects of their product. Nexium would risk damaging their brand. Is that a risk they are willing to take?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Richman</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/#comment-1909</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2009 15:23:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=1332#comment-1909</guid>
		<description>Ben,

Fair point. I happen to disagree that this would be &quot;spoofing&quot;, but I see what you&#039;re getting at. First, I don&#039;t think this is remotely like the example in your link. That&#039;s clearly misleading baiting. That&#039;s not what the intention is in my example. &quot;Remedies&quot; happens to be &quot;natural language&quot; for consumers. No one says &quot;treatment&quot; except for healthcare marketers. So, if we talk in our own language, we&#039;re not relating to our customers really well. As marketers, we need to learn and use their language. I don&#039;t think there&#039;s anything wrong with that for two reasons. First off, let&#039;s be clear, we&#039;re not going to show up in the search results as something like &quot;Featuring a natural, at home remedy&quot; and then redirect people to, say, the Nexium brand site. That&#039;s spoofing. It&#039;s clearly going to say in the title and description that shows up in the results that this is a pharma drug site. Choose to come and see or not. Second, we are only going to use the language that people use when they are looking for a drug treatment (or remedy). I don&#039;t want to waste resources on someone who is never going to ever try a prescription or non-&quot;natural&quot; treatment. I can call it whatever I like and they won&#039;t use it. I want people who are open to the option, in this case, of a prescription treatment. In order to do that, and this is the fair challenge of your argument, I need to find out whether people mean &quot;treatment,&quot; particularly a prescription &quot;treatment&quot; when they say &quot;remedy&quot; or if they really mean &quot;at home remedy.&quot; 

So, to your point, if someone is really looking for an at home, &quot;natural&quot; remedy for their heartburn when they use the term &quot;heartburn remedy&quot; in search, I wouldn&#039;t go after that term. They don&#039;t want to hear from me and I don&#039;t want to waste resources on them. Maybe remedy isn&#039;t the right word. But I know that &quot;treatment&quot; isn&#039;t the right word. This is the beauty of putting consumer product reviews on your website, consumers search optimize the site with their natural language for you. I don&#039;t have to guess or pick the wrong terms and be accused of spoofing. I let them describe the condition and use their language for how they describe the treatment.  Check out my post on this idea: http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/

&quot;Remedy&quot; was just an example. It could be a thousand other things, but I want to find the terms that are going to draw the right people to my site. That term may or may not be the right one. Point is that most companies don&#039;t invest the time in figuring out what the potential options are. 

Thanks for the comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben,</p>
<p>Fair point. I happen to disagree that this would be &#8220;spoofing&#8221;, but I see what you&#8217;re getting at. First, I don&#8217;t think this is remotely like the example in your link. That&#8217;s clearly misleading baiting. That&#8217;s not what the intention is in my example. &#8220;Remedies&#8221; happens to be &#8220;natural language&#8221; for consumers. No one says &#8220;treatment&#8221; except for healthcare marketers. So, if we talk in our own language, we&#8217;re not relating to our customers really well. As marketers, we need to learn and use their language. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s anything wrong with that for two reasons. First off, let&#8217;s be clear, we&#8217;re not going to show up in the search results as something like &#8220;Featuring a natural, at home remedy&#8221; and then redirect people to, say, the Nexium brand site. That&#8217;s spoofing. It&#8217;s clearly going to say in the title and description that shows up in the results that this is a pharma drug site. Choose to come and see or not. Second, we are only going to use the language that people use when they are looking for a drug treatment (or remedy). I don&#8217;t want to waste resources on someone who is never going to ever try a prescription or non-&#8221;natural&#8221; treatment. I can call it whatever I like and they won&#8217;t use it. I want people who are open to the option, in this case, of a prescription treatment. In order to do that, and this is the fair challenge of your argument, I need to find out whether people mean &#8220;treatment,&#8221; particularly a prescription &#8220;treatment&#8221; when they say &#8220;remedy&#8221; or if they really mean &#8220;at home remedy.&#8221; </p>
<p>So, to your point, if someone is really looking for an at home, &#8220;natural&#8221; remedy for their heartburn when they use the term &#8220;heartburn remedy&#8221; in search, I wouldn&#8217;t go after that term. They don&#8217;t want to hear from me and I don&#8217;t want to waste resources on them. Maybe remedy isn&#8217;t the right word. But I know that &#8220;treatment&#8221; isn&#8217;t the right word. This is the beauty of putting consumer product reviews on your website, consumers search optimize the site with their natural language for you. I don&#8217;t have to guess or pick the wrong terms and be accused of spoofing. I let them describe the condition and use their language for how they describe the treatment.  Check out my post on this idea: <a href="http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/" rel="nofollow">http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/07/reason-pharma-product-reviews/</a></p>
<p>&#8220;Remedy&#8221; was just an example. It could be a thousand other things, but I want to find the terms that are going to draw the right people to my site. That term may or may not be the right one. Point is that most companies don&#8217;t invest the time in figuring out what the potential options are. </p>
<p>Thanks for the comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/12 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 459/460 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: images.doseofdigital.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.doseofdigital.com @ 2012-02-07 14:20:50 -->
