<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Ante of Quality Assurance</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/05/ante-quality-assurance/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/05/ante-quality-assurance/</link>
	<description>Improving Healthcare Through Digital Technology -- Effectively using digital technology and social media in pharma and healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Richman</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/05/ante-quality-assurance/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=849#comment-767</guid>
		<description>Marc, 

For IE, including testing different versions, you should try IETester (http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage). There&#039;s a debugging feature with it as well. For Firefox, you can use an addon called Firebug. It also let&#039;s you do some debugging. A big generalization, but FF and Safari render similarly, so if you&#039;re good in one you SHOULD be good in the other.

There are some &quot;auto-diagnosis&quot; tools out there, but you&#039;ll have to pay for them. I haven&#039;t personally used them, so I can&#039;t really recommend one over another.

Best,
JMR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, </p>
<p>For IE, including testing different versions, you should try IETester (<a href="http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" rel="nofollow">http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage</a>). There&#8217;s a debugging feature with it as well. For Firefox, you can use an addon called Firebug. It also let&#8217;s you do some debugging. A big generalization, but FF and Safari render similarly, so if you&#8217;re good in one you SHOULD be good in the other.</p>
<p>There are some &#8220;auto-diagnosis&#8221; tools out there, but you&#8217;ll have to pay for them. I haven&#8217;t personally used them, so I can&#8217;t really recommend one over another.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
JMR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Richman</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/05/ante-quality-assurance/#comment-9091</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 16:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=849#comment-9091</guid>
		<description>Marc, 

For IE, including testing different versions, you should try IETester (http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage). There&#039;s a debugging feature with it as well. For Firefox, you can use an addon called Firebug. It also let&#039;s you do some debugging. A big generalization, but FF and Safari render similarly, so if you&#039;re good in one you SHOULD be good in the other.

There are some &quot;auto-diagnosis&quot; tools out there, but you&#039;ll have to pay for them. I haven&#039;t personally used them, so I can&#039;t really recommend one over another.

Best,
JMR</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Marc, </p>
<p>For IE, including testing different versions, you should try IETester (<a href="http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage" rel="nofollow">http://www.my-debugbar.com/wiki/IETester/HomePage</a>). There&#8217;s a debugging feature with it as well. For Firefox, you can use an addon called Firebug. It also let&#8217;s you do some debugging. A big generalization, but FF and Safari render similarly, so if you&#8217;re good in one you SHOULD be good in the other.</p>
<p>There are some &#8220;auto-diagnosis&#8221; tools out there, but you&#8217;ll have to pay for them. I haven&#8217;t personally used them, so I can&#8217;t really recommend one over another.</p>
<p>Best,<br />
JMR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/05/ante-quality-assurance/#comment-765</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=849#comment-765</guid>
		<description>Thx Jonathan,

We tried using www.browsershots.com to help us manage this a little, but that was really just showing us how we looked from different filters.  Any recommendations on a service that will tell you what is wrong and how to fix something that isn&#039;t showing up in a given browser properly?  Like an auto-diagnose and prescription service for sites?

Thx, and hope you&#039;re well!

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Marc’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marcrigaux.com/?p=91&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My New Favorite Show:  Real Life With Jeremy Fisher&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;&lt;/em&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx Jonathan,</p>
<p>We tried using <a href="http://www.browsershots.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.browsershots.com</a> to help us manage this a little, but that was really just showing us how we looked from different filters.  Any recommendations on a service that will tell you what is wrong and how to fix something that isn&#8217;t showing up in a given browser properly?  Like an auto-diagnose and prescription service for sites?</p>
<p>Thx, and hope you&#8217;re well!</p>
<p><abbr><em>Marc’s last blog post..<a href="http://www.marcrigaux.com/?p=91" rel="nofollow">My New Favorite Show:  Real Life With Jeremy Fisher</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2009/05/ante-quality-assurance/#comment-9090</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 13:50:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=849#comment-9090</guid>
		<description>Thx Jonathan,

We tried using www.browsershots.com to help us manage this a little, but that was really just showing us how we looked from different filters.  Any recommendations on a service that will tell you what is wrong and how to fix something that isn&#039;t showing up in a given browser properly?  Like an auto-diagnose and prescription service for sites?

Thx, and hope you&#039;re well!

&lt;abbr&gt;&lt;em&gt;Marc’s last blog post..&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.marcrigaux.com/?p=91&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;My New Favorite Show:  Real Life With Jeremy Fisher&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/abbr&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thx Jonathan,</p>
<p>We tried using <a href="http://www.browsershots.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.browsershots.com</a> to help us manage this a little, but that was really just showing us how we looked from different filters.  Any recommendations on a service that will tell you what is wrong and how to fix something that isn&#8217;t showing up in a given browser properly?  Like an auto-diagnose and prescription service for sites?</p>
<p>Thx, and hope you&#8217;re well!</p>
<p><abbr><em>Marc’s last blog post..<a href="http://www.marcrigaux.com/?p=91" rel="nofollow">My New Favorite Show:  Real Life With Jeremy Fisher</a></em></abbr></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 7/16 queries in 0.033 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 427/443 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: images.doseofdigital.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.doseofdigital.com @ 2012-02-07 14:07:26 -->
