Social Media Wiki

Providing Meaningful Customer Service in Healthcare



Mini White Paper

Think about some of the companies and products you admire most. Now think of the companies and products you love. I don’t mean cases where you just use the products or like the products, I mean you love them. Got it? Now then…

Question one:  what is it that you love about the companies or products you listed?

Question two:were there any healthcare or pharma products on that list?

I’d almost guarantee the answer to question two is no.

How come? I guessing the answer to question one could tell you that. The reason I’ve seen for why people really love a company or product is because of something beyond the product. It’s all the added benefits and the emotional connections people make. One of the most critical added benefits comes from customer service. Customer service can be the difference between a reviled product and one that’s truly loved. You can spot these truly loved companies and products because they are the ones with intensely loyal customers and sustainable success. Can you name a single pharma product that fits that description? I can’t. And this, despite that fact that pharma products are often the difference between life and death for many people. You’d think that would create loyalty. You’d think that would cause someone to speak up at a cocktail party where the pharma companies are the focus of everyone’s anger. But it doesn’t.

Why?

Consider this from a recent Manhattan Research study, “More than three-quarters of ePharma Consumers report that they “expect” online customer service from a pharmaceutical company.” EPharma Consumers are “those who use the Internet to research prescription drug information. In past five years alone this group has tripled to about 95 million U.S. adults.”

75% expect online customer service. Why? In my opinion the answer is simple. I wrote about this a bit in my post about DFC (Direct from Consumer) marketing. People expect pharma companies to have online customer service because everything else they buy or research online has it. Whether they are buying shoes, computers, or golf clubs, someone is available to provide immediate customer service. This isn’t just customer service to help with a return or handle complaints. This is customer service to provide recommendations, to help find the right product, and, if necessary, direct you somewhere else if the company doesn’t have what you need.

So, do any healthcare companies do this? Some try at least. For example, GSK has their “GSK Response Center” and many other companies provide an “800″ number you can call to speak with someone as well. In my experience, these call centers exist more to deal with side effect issues versus providing real service. They are staffed with medical folks, sometimes nurses or PharmDs. They aren’t staffed with genuine customer service experts. Moreover, most companies probably don’t want you to call. Dealing with your side effect report is a pain, so it’s a bit difficult to find where to call in most cases.

Consider the GSK Response Center. A link is included on almost every product website, but finding it is a bit of a scavenger hunt.

Advair Page

There it is. All the way at the bottom in that little icon. Incidentally, the page “fold” falls right above the fair balance, so many people probably don’t know there’s anything down there. Contrast this with Zappos’ landing page.

zappospage

Find how to contact them? Pretty simple. And, oh yes, you can chat live and don’t need to call.

So, we know that people are expecting there to be online customer service. Number one, if you don’t have it yet, you’d better figure out how to get it. Number two, if you do have it, make it easy for people to find. Number three, and most challenging, make it meaningful. It can’t be just about your drug. It needs to help in other ways too.

What I (and others at our company) do everyday is simple. I take the best of what’s being done in emarketing in every industry and figure out how it applies to healthcare and pharma. It sounds simple because it is. All it takes is a willingness to accept that innovation often comes from places far, far away from your industry. This begs the question: how come I can get better customer service from the company that sells me flip flops than the company that sell me my breast cancer drug? Before you answer, you should know that there isn’t a defensible answer.

Providing meaningful customer service, whether online or off, means adding value beyond your product. That’s why Progressive gives you quotes from other insurance companies or why Zappos (yes, them again) will help you find what you’re looking for if they don’t carry it. Seriously. Try it for yourself. Is your customer service group prepared or willing to do this? Are they standing by ready to talk people OUT of using your products? If not, they’re not and you’re not ready to tackle this.

You might say that you do this already. If someone calls and asks if they should take a drug that’s clearly not indicated for them, you probably tell them that. Before you pat yourself on the back remember that you’re REQUIRED to do that. How about when someone calls and is having a hard time paying for your product, but they don’t quite qualify for your assistance program? Are you going to tell them that a less expensive generic with equivilent data is just as good? If they call after starting your hypertension drug, are you prepared to answer how many milligrams of sodium they should have in a day or what’s a good way to get started with an exercise program? If not, you’re not ready. Don’t have customer support that can’t provide the support that people are used to receiving…

…from a shoe salesman.

Subscribe to the Dose of Digital RSS Feed


Join
Dose of Digital on Facebook for exclusive content and sneak previews.



Ready to hire the folks behind Dose of Digital? Contact us.

Possibly related posts (auto-generated):

  1. What Pharma Can Learn from the Pizza Guy
  2. DFC: The New DTC
  3. Gaming To Save Healthcare Marketing


Print This Post Print This Post

  • All good comments, but there is a shift in how people are using the web and the expectation they have from the companies that they do business with. For instance, a customer will be going online for pharmaceutical information for several reasons, but in a majority of cases, they will be looking for advantages a particular brand offers over another or how a drug is effecting them and more information on that effect (positive or negative).

    The "web 2.0 effect" complicates matters more for pharma, since other industries offer a much more flexible model for companies to interact and respond to their customers. It's no fault of the makers of Advair, but there is no sanctioned venue for patients to provide immediate support or feedback to drug makers.

    In the case of Advair, a patient has few options within brand to get immediate help with an asthma attack. They are only able to find other, un-proven avenues of support.

    A possible solution may be areas on the homepage (this works especially well for Advair) for customers who are experiencing an attack and have questions about how Advair can help or links to areas in the site that speak to asthma control and reactions.
  • Michael
    I don't remember who said it, but it is one of my favorite quotes (and understand I am a champion and believer in relationship marketing):

    "People don't want a relationship with tylenol, they just want their f*****g headache to go away"

    The healthcare system is confusing and muddled, people latch on to others on many levels for guidance... yes pharma can get people to appreciate the services and value provided (and agree that pharma has a lot of work to do just to get close to this), but people go online to fight cancer together b/c they are scared, not because they love the medicines that are helping them fight.

    Keep trying to convince me that people love their Lipitor or Crestor... they don't, people hate having to lower their cholesterol and change their entire lifestyle to survive... no matter how much lipitor is written or how well it works.

    You can cherry pick 1-2 medicines like Viagra and make an argument, but relationship marketing for pharma is fundamentally different vs. any other vertical/category... b/c the only good news is when something bad goes away with "manageable" side effects. Very hard to actually have a relationship in that context... at best you can be a consultant or advisor. I'll settle for getting people to trust a brand or pharma company, but I don't see ongoing relationship marketing and brand fanaticism happening quite the way you do- and even if it does happen- pharma can only go so far to enable that for risk of off-label promotion.. pharma will never be able to compare with the patient's relationship with a doctor or pharmacist and in many cases, probably shouldn't be fighting for that level of contact... but that is all just one man's opinion.
  • Really well said. A completely different opinion than mine and I'm not going to say you're wrong. I'm glad there's some debate and would love to hear from others. Point of clarity...I'm not saying people love their Lipitor or Crestor now. I'm saying we should be working towards a time and place where they do. Michael makes some great points about why that'll be so hard, but I think its a good thing to keep in the back of our minds as we're developing our plans. Is this such a bad thing thing to work towards at least? Won't it make us be more patient-focused in how we market? That's got to be a good thing all around.
  • Michael
    The reason no one has a pharma company or brand as their favorite is because the product is a "negative-good"; there isn't a medicine out there that people HAVE to take because something is wrong with them... yes this product makes them better, but who really wants that kind of help in the first place.

    Pharma does good work, but at the end of the day, people ALWAYS prefer to not be sick, even if there is a miracle by pill.
  • Thanks for the comment, Michael.

    However, I do disagree with you. I completely get your point about "negative-good", but I think this only holds to a point. People only see their doctor when they are sick (negative), but if you tell them they can no longer see their doctor (as MCOs have tried to do), people freak out. Yes, there's a more personal connection there since it's a person, but people get tattoos of the Apple and Harley logos all the time and those aren't people.

    In addition, I think OTC healthcare brands have done this well. When I go to get acetaminophen for my daughter, I don't even look at the generics, I demand Tylenol even though I know scientifically and intellectually that it is the EXACT same thing. It's the same reason why people pay 30% more for Morton salt versus the store brand. Talk about a commodity. Why doesn't this work for RX pharma?

    One final thought, when Nolvadex was available as a branded product (one I sold as a pharma rep), it had a cameo logo on one side on a very small, white pill. When the generic first came available, there was a big backlash for almost a year because people who were substituted the generic got home and found they were given the "wrong" medication. They demanded the brand that got them this far in their treatment (AZ actually produced the brand and generic at that time, so I know they were EXACTLY the same). That was a simple icon. Consider when Viagra goes generic, do you think people will readily accept anything that isn't a diamond shaped, blue pill? They won't. Eventually, they will, but at first and for at least a year, they won't. It's a simple way to legally and without controversy extend sales after patent expiration.

    This is a simple branding fix that pharma still hasn't really embraced despite the fact that you can add color, laser etched images and tastes to pills now for virtually no cost. Imagine when someone gets switched to a generic that doesn't TASTE like their normal pill. Do you think their loyalty will kick in then?

    Imagine if we instead connected loyalty to a more meaningful, emotional activity like great customer service or an amazing support program. What loyalty might that drive?
  • Hooray for a great post. You drive the point home very nicely about what it means to deliver meaningful customer service. It is baffling why this has been difficult for health care organizations in general, but slowly change is coming about. I salute you in pushing organizations to take a look inside and make some changes that will have their patients/customers enjoying the difference. It will not be simple but it will be of value for the organization AND the patient/consumer. Thanks.
blog comments powered by Disqus