Social Media Wiki

How to Avoid FDA Regulations Using Mobile Marketing

Mini White Paper

Based on my title, you’re reading this for one of three reasons:

  1. You sincerely are looking to skirt DDMAC rules and need some inspiration;
  2. You follow the rules, but want to see what you’re missing;
  3. You are the FDA and want my address;

Great. You’ll all be pleased with the content here. In reality, I’m not looking for ways around DDMAC rules. It’s just too big of a risk (or is it?). In addition, I’m certainly not advocating spreading inaccurate information about your brand or stretching the truth. Rather, I’d like to show you just one way to avoid one annoying rule the FDA has set up for us healthcare marketers. Why would I do this? Well…I’m hoping if I point out enough of these gaps that the FDA is going take some action in setting out some updated and usable rules that tell us how we can use the latest digital technologies to market healthcare products.

Without these rules, you’re left with an industry that is finding it harder and harder to effectively market its products and a regulating body who has rules that are less and less in touch with reality.  This only makes both sides more agitated and frustrated, a potentially bad combination. So, I guess I’m poking the sleeping giant with a stick to see what happens. I hope when it awakes that it’s a friendly giant and it doesn’t decide to crush our collective digital marketing skulls.

Moving along.

The annoying rule I’m referring to is that pesky detail about including fair balance anytime you include both the product name and the condition it treats in any form of promotion. That slightly oversimplifies the rule, but basically that’s it. If you say “Ranexa”  and that it treats chronic angina then you’d better have some fair balance and probably the full prescribing information (free plug for my friends at CV Therapeutics).

So, here are your choices to avoid all that fair balance. You can simply do a promotion that uses the brand name and doesn’t say what it does. These “awareness” ads are fine although they almost certainly don’t do anything for anyone or actually increase the usage of your product. Alternatively, you can say that there’s a product that has multiple benefits for some disease, but you can’t say what it is. It’s kind of like your own little secret. Again, not sure of the value here.

Imagine instead if I had a way you could do both. You could say what the drug does AND show the name with no fair balance at all. Well, ladies and gentlemen, you can with the help of a little technology called the QR Code. What are these wonderful things? A semi-simple explanation from Wikipedia:

“A QR Code is a matrix code (or two-dimensional bar code) created by Japanese corporation Denso-Wave in 1994. The “QR” is derived from “Quick Response”, as the creator intended the code to allow its contents to be decoded at high speed…QR Codes are now used in a much broader context, including both commercial tracking applications and convenience-oriented applications aimed at mobile phone users (known as mobile tagging). QR Codes storing addresses and URLs may appear in magazines, on signs, buses, business cards or just about any object that users might need information about. Users with a camera phone equipped with the correct reader software can scan the image of the QR Code causing the phone’s browser to launch and redirect to the programmed URL.”

For all the visual folks out there, this is a QR Code:

Dose of Digital QR Code

 

This QR Code points to this blog’s URL, doseofdigital.com. All you need is a phone with a QR Code reader and when you “tag”  this code (i.e., use the reader software), you’re phone’s web browser opens to this blog. Amazing, eh? (Interested in adding the reader software to your smartphone? Go here.)

Back to the task at hand, getting around FDA regulations. Here’s a pretty standard print ad featuring Boniva. Limited product messaging and about 40% of the space dedicated to fair balance fine print.

Sally Field Boniva

Now imagine that you can eliminate all that fair balance nonsense. Well, now you can. Interested?  If Roche/GSK decided that they wanted to say they had a drug to treat thinning bones and left it at that, no fair balance required. Alternatively, Sally could have said that she takes Boniva, but she’d have to leave out that inspiring quote. Either the name or what it does, but not both, you choose. So, here’s how you get both. [Try to ignore my 5-minute copy and design work.]

Revised Boniva Ad

Sally’s picture can be larger first of all. I’m assuming that’s a good thing since they’ve spent so much for her endorsement. But look, no fair balance because I say what the drug does (keeping bones strong and healthy) and I don’t mention the name…or do I? If your cell phone had a QR Code reader, you can just “tag” the code and your phone shows this (try it for yourself):

Boniva QR Code on Phone

Tah, dah! Your ad essentially can now show the drug name and what it does, but you can avoid all that pesky fine print. Heck, you even save some trees because you can avoid the page with all the patient information text as well. Right?

Okay, here’s the deal. Of course, I’m not advocating intentionally avoiding FDA regulations. Seriously. What I’m trying to point out is that without effective guidelines for digital media from the FDA, this is going to start happening. QR Code readers are only on about 5-10% of phones in the US, so most consumers would have no idea what it was. In Japan, QR Code readers are on almost 90% of phones. Combine the will and technical ability and someone is going to try this approach. Will they be in violation? Letter of the law says “no.” Spirit of the law probably says “yes.” Maybe it isn’t QR Codes, but it’s going to be some new digital technology.

This post is really addressed to the FDA. Either they set the rules now or healthcare marketers will set the rules for them. I’m sure the FDA isn’t interested in that approach. This follows on my post “FDA Isn’t Ready for Us…Stop All E-Marketing.” There I mentioned that I was crafting some guidelines on regulations for social media and digital technologies. Mobile needs to be a part of this. What I wanted to show in this post is what’s possible if no one comes forward and lays out the rules. The market will set the rules and no one is going to be happy with the result. The FDA can set rules that represent a reasonable comprise to give healthcare marketers some some leeway to try some new digital technologies like mobile and social media, but that ensure the spirit of regulations are accounted for.

So, to the FDA folks out there: are you ready to see bigger Sally Field ads with no fair balance or are you ready to act?

Pharma and Healthcare Social Media Wiki Live

I’ve heard and been part of many conversations and fielded a lot of questions all asking the same thing: “Are there any healthcare companies using social media?” or “Are any pharma companies using <insert social media channel>?”

I’ve handled these in the past as one off answers, but I thought there might be a better way…a wiki. Why not answer this social media question with a social media answer?

Here’s where you come in. I’ll be adding to the list from time to time, but it’s supposed to be owned by all of us. That means you have to add to it. Just like Wikipedia, it’ll only be as good as its contributors. I’ve added a couple things just as a demonstration, but I hope many more of you add on a regular basis. After that, you can refer anyone you want to the list or use it for your own reference.

Visit the Healthcare Social Media Wiki. Full instructions on how to add to the wiki are included there.

Thanks in advance for your contributions and I hope the list is valuable to you.

FDA Uses Social Media, But You Can’t

I’ve always wanted to say this, so here it goes: “Do as I say, not as I do.”

Well, technically it’s not me saying it, but the FDA.

I’ve written quite a bit about the usage of social media in healthcare (here, here, and here) and there are a bunch of blogs out there dedicated specifically to this topic (check out my blogroll for a few). I’ve talked with hundreds of healthcare marketers over the years with one familiar refrain: “We can’t do social media. The FDA hasn’t told us what we can do or given us any guidance.”  I wrote about this very fact in a post I half-jokingly titled, “FDA Isn’t Ready For Us…Stop All E-Marketing!”  Half-joking. If you’ve seen a “2253″ form, you know I’m not totally joking. Haven’t seen one? Get your souvenir copy here. As I said in my post, of the 40 different categories of promotion recognized by the FDA, only one is Internet-based, the rather generic “WWW” category. That tells me that the FDA isn’t quite in the 21st century. 

But I was wrong.

While I was searching around Twitter last week, I came across @FDARecalls. Turns out, for all their lack of regulations for social media, the FDA sure likes it. I couldn’t help but Tweet this: “FDA (@fdarecalls) uses Twitter, but doesn’t have any guidelines for using social media. I’ll take ‘Irony’ for $200, Alex.”

Much to my surprise, I got a response to my tweet from @AndrewPWilson, a “Member of the HHS Social Media Team” according to his profile. The WHAT?!? HHS (Health and Human Services, by the way), HHS Social Media team. They have a team dedicated to social media? They’re doing better than most healthcare companies. Of course, the FDA can’t really send itself a warning letter so they’re a little more relaxed.

Andrew responded with this:

@jonmrich Can you clarify what you mean by guidelines? Really like to know what you’d like to see. FYI – http://www.cdc.gov/socialmedia

We had a good exchange from there and I sensed that he genuinely wants to figure out a way to help healthcare marketers use social media in a compliant way. I’m staying positive for now.

I followed the link that Andrew included in his reply and found myself in government-sponsored social media nirvana. Follow along to “Social Media Tools for Consumers and Partners.” I couldn’t believe this page when I got to it. If I found it via Digg, I’d think it was fake. Here you’ll find everything related to social media that the HHS, FDA, and CDC does. Turns out that there are a lot of taxpayer dollars going towards interactive technology.What you’ll find on this page is a bunch of digital tactics that even the most digitally savvy healthcare companies have yet to try. The list:

  • Blogs
  • Email Subscriptions
  • Health-e-Cards (Get it, health-e-cards…healthy cards…hilarious. The government even has a sense of humor when social media is involved.)
  • Mobile (yes, they have a mobile site)
  • Online video including a CDC YouTube Channel AND an FDA YouTube Channel
  • Podcasts
  • RSS Feeds
  • Social Networks included a CDC MySpace page (yes, you can be friends with the Centers for Disease Control)
  • Badges (yes, blog badges). You’ve got to see these.
  • Twitter accounts including @FDARecalls, CDCEmergency, and CDC_ehealth
  • Widgets. There are 10 total. Yes, 10. I recommend the Salmonella Outbreak Map
  • “Virtual Worlds” Translation: Second Life. Yes, the CDC has an island in Second Life. Don’t believe me? You can’t make this stuff up.

I wrote this exclamation a while back in another post: “The question is: does FDA even know this is an issue? Who is the expert there on digital marketing who can help set the next generation of rules and regulations so that healthcare marketing can catch up to the rest of the world?” I also wondered aloud:  “If there is one person at FDA who knows how to use “The Computer” who reviews all of this stuff. If it’s got a “WWW” on the 2253, it just goes over to Ted in IT for a quick look.”

Ironically, it turns out the FDA knows more about digital than you. Yes, you. The average healthcare marketer. Do you know how and why you might use all these social media channels the FDA is using? In my experience, the answer is no. You said it yourselves actually. In a recent study done by MarketBridge, pharma marketers were asked to rate their understanding of digital marketing and nearly 45% said they “need to know more.” 

So it turns out that the FDA is actually ready for you and your social media programs. They might even know more than you do. However, we’re still left without clear guidelines that would save everyone a lot of headaches. Until then, I’ll continue my quest to help get these crafted. If you’re interested in helping, please contact me.

Until then, I’ll just add this awesome badge on this blog. 

Gaming To Save Healthcare Marketing

Mini White Paper

Yes, that’s right. Reread that headline. “Gaming to Save Healthcare Marketing.”

At least, it’s one of my theories.

After spending many years in sales and marketing in healthcare (particularly pharma), I’ve noticed, as have all of you, that the effectiveness of our marketing continues to decrease. People are bombarded more than ever by our advertising and our advertising itself has actually gotten worse. By worse, I mean that not only has quality suffered, but also the meaning it brings to consumers is disappearing. Our company is a big believer (in fact, we invented the term) in  Marketing with Meaning. I’ll won’t go into the details here, but the basic idea is that your marketing, your advertising, should, in of itself, be meaningful to customers. Does your marketing bring any value to consumers?

Gaming is a great example. Many online games, including classics like Bejeweled, fit the profile for Marketing with Meaning. Almost all of these games on sites like Pogo are free. They are completely ad supported. So, the agreement is that I, the sponsor, pay for your game and in return I display a banner advertisement. I market my product and in doing so you get something in return that is meaningful to you. Novartis has already seen the value of this and started to advertise on Pogo (PS: they also use Twitter). Here’s one of their ads:

 

Diovan on Pogo

Okay, not stunning in it’s beauty, but you get the idea.

I know what you’re thinking. “We targeting older folks with our products. They’re not gamers.” In fact, they are. Here are some stats from two sources (Pew and ESA):

  • Average game player age: 35
  • 26% are 50+
  • 47% of online games played are “puzzle, board, game show, trivia, or card” games
  • 36% of gamers 65+ say they play EVERYDAY or almost everyday (the highest of any age group)
  • 50% of gamers are women

Anyone from your target audience in there? I’d bet so. Another myth dispelled.

So, sponsoring a game and plastering a banner all over it is one way to break into this market. The next step up is a sponsored game where you sponsor a newly launched or existing game that allows people to download it for free or play online for free. You’re the exclusive sponsor and hopefully you can try to find a game that might appeal to your target group versus a more untargeted banner ad. 

But there’s a better way. Why not add a game (or two or three) to your brand site? You want folks visiting your site on a regular basis, right? You want them to stay for a long them when they come, right? But,your content has to be compelling in order to do that. Perhaps a game is the answer. You can start with a ready-made one that everyone will recognize. Hats off to Takeda and their Rozerem site for trying this out. They added a chess game for people who can’t sleep since Rozerem is a sleep aid. Granted, I’m not sure why helping people stay awake is useful in this case, but the concept is good.

 

Rozerem Chess Game

Not the hardest chess game I’ve ever faced (I won in 14 moves), but I was playing a rodent. Takeda is updating their site and by the looks of the placeholder site, it’ll be like every other pharma site. So long Mr. Beaver, we hardly knew thee.

The final and ultimate step in gaming is to develop a custom game for your brand. There are two reasons for this. First, you control exactly what goes into the game and you can actually make it relevant to the disease your drug is targeting. The greatest example of this in healthcare is Re-Mission. This game was created to help kids fighting various cancers. It’s essentially a first-person shooter-type game, but you’re battling the disease.

 

Re-Mission

 

That’s wonderful. They created a game for kids fighting cancer to help them pass the time during treatment. Right? No. This game was designed to improve outcomes. In fact, the company behind this game, Hope Lab, conducted a randomized trial to test the game’s effectiveness. Half played Re-Mission and half another video game. The results were published in the journal Pediatrics. Here are some high points I know all you pharma marketers will be interested in:

  • “Self-efficacy and knowledge were significantly improved in the intervention group compared with the control group.”
  • “Adherence to at-home medication (trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and 6 mercaptopuring) was significantly improved in the intervention group compared with the control group.”

Did they say improved adherence? With a video game? Makes you think twice about your email refill reminders and how they are working, doesn’t it? How much are you throwing against adherence doing the same types of programs that have been tried for 20 years with minimal effect? Maybe it’s time to try something new.

This type of game fits into the “serious games” genre. A number of healthcare-related serious games have already been created. They even have a conference. The Games for Health group is a non-profit that’s a big player in this area. Check out some screenshots from some of their games on Flickr.

You can have your own game as well. Figure out who your audience is and what would be a fun and engaging experience for them that they’d WANT to play. If there aren’t any gamers on your team and you can’t imagine how this might work, give me a call and I can help you out. I’ll bring the Wii.

Older Posts »