<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Medical Jargon Makes You Sicker (Sort Of)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.doseofdigital.com/2008/12/medical-jargon-makes-you-sicker-sort-of/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2008/12/medical-jargon-makes-you-sicker-sort-of/</link>
	<description>Improving Healthcare Through Digital Technology -- Effectively using digital technology and social media in pharma and healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 00:11:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Richman</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2008/12/medical-jargon-makes-you-sicker-sort-of/#comment-25</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=48#comment-25</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t read the book, Bob, but an interesting corollary. You said: &quot;Some suggest that these people thought that maybe there condition was a lot worse than they thought it was - so they worried more and reacted negatively!&quot;

Just to make it more confusing, check out this study that was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10547166). This study had a prayer and non-prayer group. However, the difference here is that the people being prayed for were never told. In this study, the prayed for patients had a statistically significantly lower treatment course scores (a good thing). 

Maybe this proves the theory even more. Don&#039;t make people think they&#039;ve got a worse disease than they actually do. Not surprising, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t read the book, Bob, but an interesting corollary. You said: &#8220;Some suggest that these people thought that maybe there condition was a lot worse than they thought it was &#8211; so they worried more and reacted negatively!&#8221;</p>
<p>Just to make it more confusing, check out this study that was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine (<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10547166" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10547166</a>). This study had a prayer and non-prayer group. However, the difference here is that the people being prayed for were never told. In this study, the prayed for patients had a statistically significantly lower treatment course scores (a good thing). </p>
<p>Maybe this proves the theory even more. Don&#8217;t make people think they&#8217;ve got a worse disease than they actually do. Not surprising, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jonathan Richman</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2008/12/medical-jargon-makes-you-sicker-sort-of/#comment-8983</link>
		<dc:creator>Jonathan Richman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 22:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=48#comment-8983</guid>
		<description>Haven&#039;t read the book, Bob, but an interesting corollary. You said: &quot;Some suggest that these people thought that maybe there condition was a lot worse than they thought it was - so they worried more and reacted negatively!&quot;

Just to make it more confusing, check out this study that was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10547166). This study had a prayer and non-prayer group. However, the difference here is that the people being prayed for were never told. In this study, the prayed for patients had a statistically significantly lower treatment course scores (a good thing). 

Maybe this proves the theory even more. Don&#039;t make people think they&#039;ve got a worse disease than they actually do. Not surprising, I suppose.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Haven&#8217;t read the book, Bob, but an interesting corollary. You said: &#8220;Some suggest that these people thought that maybe there condition was a lot worse than they thought it was &#8211; so they worried more and reacted negatively!&#8221;</p>
<p>Just to make it more confusing, check out this study that was published in the Archives of Internal Medicine (<a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10547166" rel="nofollow">http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10547166</a>). This study had a prayer and non-prayer group. However, the difference here is that the people being prayed for were never told. In this study, the prayed for patients had a statistically significantly lower treatment course scores (a good thing). </p>
<p>Maybe this proves the theory even more. Don&#8217;t make people think they&#8217;ve got a worse disease than they actually do. Not surprising, I suppose.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob G</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2008/12/medical-jargon-makes-you-sicker-sort-of/#comment-24</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=48#comment-24</guid>
		<description>Great find, Jonathan.

Something slightly similar I recently read in the controversial book, The God Delusion: An experiment to measure the impact of prayer on hospital complications and recovery time showed that there was no benefit to the people who were prayed for.  In fact, in a leg where people were told they were being prayed for, the subjects actually significantly worsened versus the control leg.  Some suggest that these people thought that maybe there condition was a lot worse than they thought it was - so they worried more and reacted negatively!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great find, Jonathan.</p>
<p>Something slightly similar I recently read in the controversial book, The God Delusion: An experiment to measure the impact of prayer on hospital complications and recovery time showed that there was no benefit to the people who were prayed for.  In fact, in a leg where people were told they were being prayed for, the subjects actually significantly worsened versus the control leg.  Some suggest that these people thought that maybe there condition was a lot worse than they thought it was &#8211; so they worried more and reacted negatively!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob G</title>
		<link>http://www.doseofdigital.com/2008/12/medical-jargon-makes-you-sicker-sort-of/#comment-8982</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob G</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Dec 2008 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.doseofdigital.com/?p=48#comment-8982</guid>
		<description>Great find, Jonathan.

Something slightly similar I recently read in the controversial book, The God Delusion: An experiment to measure the impact of prayer on hospital complications and recovery time showed that there was no benefit to the people who were prayed for.  In fact, in a leg where people were told they were being prayed for, the subjects actually significantly worsened versus the control leg.  Some suggest that these people thought that maybe there condition was a lot worse than they thought it was - so they worried more and reacted negatively!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great find, Jonathan.</p>
<p>Something slightly similar I recently read in the controversial book, The God Delusion: An experiment to measure the impact of prayer on hospital complications and recovery time showed that there was no benefit to the people who were prayed for.  In fact, in a leg where people were told they were being prayed for, the subjects actually significantly worsened versus the control leg.  Some suggest that these people thought that maybe there condition was a lot worse than they thought it was &#8211; so they worried more and reacted negatively!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 8/12 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 426/427 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: images.doseofdigital.com (user agent is rejected)

Served from: www.doseofdigital.com @ 2012-02-07 14:44:33 -->
